Duncan Anderson

Bid package review

Bid package review workflow for overloaded subcontractor estimators

Turn messy plans, specs, addenda, bid forms, GC instructions, and estimator notes into a structured pre-bid review your estimator can actually use before price lock.

Built by Duncan Anderson, an AI engineer and data scientist who builds practical automation around real operating workflows.

What usually breaks

Where commercial subcontractors lose time or revenue

The first audit is deliberately narrow. We identify the repeatable workflow, the owner, the inputs, the status points, and the places where a small automation would actually survive daily use.

Bid invites, addenda, drawing sheets, alternates, allowances, and proposal templates live in different email threads or folders.

RFIs are written late, or unanswered RFIs become rushed proposal qualifications.

Vendor quote requests go out without a clean scope split for controls, fire alarm, testing, startup, closeout, or AHJ requirements.

Estimator notes are useful but never become a reusable checklist for the next similar package.

Workflow map

The audit follows the real work, not a generic AI checklist

This page is based on the Bid Package Review workflow: a narrow construction bid desk concept focused on scope notes, RFI candidates, risk flags, exclusions, and bid-day checklists rather than full estimating or takeoff.

1

Package intake: plans, specs, addenda, bid instructions, bid form, proposal template, scope letter, and estimator notes.

2

Document completeness check: missing addenda logs, final bid forms, alternates, allowances, unit prices, bonding, taxes, and delivery instructions.

3

Scope boundary scan: divisions, trade overlaps, vendor responsibilities, exclusions, clarifications, and unclear GC requirements.

4

Output: RFI candidates, proposal qualifications, vendor quote prompts, risk flags, and a bid-day checklist.

Automation candidates

Likely first builds

The right first build is usually small, specific, and close to revenue or deadline pressure.

1

A bid package intake checklist that forces every package through the same document completeness review.

2

RFI and qualification draft generation from ambiguous scope, missing sheets, addenda changes, and vendor dependencies.

3

Estimator-ready bid-day checklist generation for addenda acknowledgements, alternates, allowances, taxes, bonding, and submission instructions.

4

Reusable review templates by trade so the second package is faster than the first.

Audit output

What you get back

The goal is a decision-ready plan: what to automate first, what to keep manual, and what data or tool connection is needed.

A workflow map from bid invite to submitted proposal.

A missing-document and addenda-risk checklist.

A first-pass structure for RFI candidates, exclusions, and bid-day checks.

A practical build plan for a concierge-assisted or semi-automated bid review workflow.

Request the audit

Send the workflow that is costing time, deals, or deadline confidence

Specifics help. Include the tools involved, how the work arrives, who owns it, where status gets lost, and what would count as a useful win.

Search intent this page is built around: construction bid package review, subcontractor bid review, bid package RFI review, construction addenda checklist.

Request an audit

Tell me what workflow you want fixed.

Context: Bid package review workflow for overloaded subcontractor estimators

Best fit: a real business workflow, a clear owner, and enough volume that saving a few hours every week matters.