Duncan Anderson

Maintenance intake

Property management maintenance intake workflow for tenant requests and vendor follow-through

Turn tenant maintenance emails, portal requests, texts, photos, vendor updates, owner approvals, and completion notes into one trackable workflow.

From CAD 6,500 · fixed before we start · 10 business days · 6 deliverables

How the sprint works →

Built by Duncan Anderson, an AI engineer and data scientist who builds practical automation around real operating workflows.

What usually breaks

Where property managers lose time or revenue

The first audit is deliberately narrow. We identify the repeatable workflow, the owner, the inputs, the status points, and the places where a small automation would actually survive daily use.

  • Tenant requests arrive through too many channels and need manual re-entry.
  • Urgent items, repeat issues, and photo evidence are not consistently categorized.
  • Vendor dispatch and owner approvals live in separate email threads.
  • Weekly owner updates require manual status cleanup.

Readiness Sprint

A fixed first step before any larger automation build

Before anyone builds, we map one costly workflow end to end, decide what AI should draft and what people must approve, and write the pilot brief. You keep every document whether or not we build together.

  • From CAD 6,500, fixed before we start
  • 10 business days
  • 50% to start, 50% at readout
  • English or French
How the sprint works →

Six things you keep

  1. Workflow map

    Current state end to end: steps, handoffs, systems, volumes and where time goes.

  2. Intake and status schema

    The fields and states a system would read and write, agreed with the people who do the work.

  3. Exception taxonomy and decision rights

    What goes wrong, how often, and who is allowed to decide each case.

  4. Review-first prototype spec

    Exactly what AI drafts, what a person approves, and what is never automated.

  5. Pilot and measurement brief

    Scope, baseline, success metric, stop conditions and a fixed-fee build quote.

  6. Executive readout

    Findings and a clear build / don't-build recommendation, with one round of revisions.

Offer path

Document Intake and Review Workflow

An intake queue with missing-info checks, summaries, classifications, status, and a human approval step before records change.

First build could be

A small workflow your team can review

Unified maintenance intake queue from email/forms/portal exports.

Not this

Clear scope boundary

This is not property management software replacement; it cleans up intake, vendor follow-through, and status.

Workflow map

The audit follows the real work, not a generic AI checklist

The audit targets tenant/vendor admin load, where small firms often know the process but lack a dependable system.

  1. Request intake, property/unit, tenant, category, urgency, photo/document attachments, and duplicate detection.

  2. Triage decision: emergency, routine, tenant responsibility, owner approval, warranty/vendor callback, or quote needed.

  3. Vendor assignment, scheduling, status updates, completion proof, invoice capture, and owner/tenant communication.

  4. Reporting for open aging, repeat issue types, vendor response time, and owner approvals.

Automation candidates

Likely first builds

The right first build is usually small, specific, and close to revenue or deadline pressure.

  1. Unified maintenance intake queue from email/forms/portal exports.

  2. AI triage labels for urgency, trade category, duplicate issue, and missing information.

  3. Vendor follow-up reminders and tenant status update drafts.

  4. Owner approval packets with summary, photos, estimate, and recommended next action.

Audit output

What you get back

The goal is a decision-ready plan: what to automate first, what to keep manual, and what data or tool connection is needed.

  • A maintenance request lifecycle map.
  • A triage taxonomy for urgency, category, owner approval, and vendor routing.
  • A status-update and vendor follow-up automation plan.
  • A reporting view for open tickets, aging, vendor response, and repeat issues.

Request a fit review

Send the workflow that is costing time, deals, or deadline confidence

Specifics help. Include the tools involved, how the work arrives, who owns it, where status gets lost, and what would count as a useful win.

What happens next

I review every workflow personally and usually reply within two business days. If there is a fit, the next paid step is the AI Readiness Sprint.

From CAD 6,500 · fixed before we start · 10 business days · 6 deliverables

How the sprint works →

Send workflow details

Context: Property management maintenance intake workflow for tenant requests and vendor follow-through

A few plain sentences is enough. Current tools, volume, or urgency can go here if they matter.

Used only to assess and reply to this request. Do not include credentials or sensitive client records.

Other workflow audits

Related operational bottlenecks

  • Commercial subcontractors

    Bid Package Review

    Review plans, specs, addenda, bid forms, scope gaps, RFIs, exclusions, and bid-day checklists before commercial subcontractor bids go out.

  • Roofing contractors

    Roofing Follow-Up

    Automate roofing estimate follow-up, proposal reminders, photo notes, production handoffs, and lost-quote tracking.

  • HVAC and plumbing service companies

    HVAC/Plumbing Dispatch

    Improve HVAC and plumbing dispatch workflows, missed-call handling, quote follow-up, service notes, and recurring maintenance reminders.