Selected work / Case studies
What I built, what changed, and what I can prove.
These are working systems, not capability demos. Each example names the recurring problem, my role, the verifiable result, and the decision that still belongs to a person.
Client example / Healthcare practice
A private leadership dashboard for a clinic owner.
The problemThe owner had Jane reports and bank exports, but no dependable weekly view of revenue, appointments, therapist capacity, expenses, or which figures were still incomplete.
What I builtI built a guided refresh process and private dashboard. It recognizes the agreed Jane reports, can include bank files when financial reporting needs them, removes direct client details, and carries source warnings into the owner’s review instead of filling gaps with guesses.
What can be verifiedVerified here: the private dashboard and refresh process work end to end; current reporting periods and incomplete sources are named; raw uploads and direct client identifiers are not retained. Client metrics and screenshots remain private.
What stays humanThe dashboard prepares the review. The owner and accountant still decide how to interpret incomplete periods, cash position, reserves, and any figure that needs financial judgment.
Four systems / Four kinds of proof
A live subscription product, its business-monitoring system, a confidential enterprise tool, and a client publishing process.
- 01The LineupLive product
- 02The Lineup AI OperationsProduction operations system
- 03Dispute DefenderProduction enterprise system
- 04Trauma Therapy Group PublisherClient delivery
The Lineup
Live customer product
01
Live inputs
Current market context
02
Model view
Projection and confidence
03
Recorded result
Automatically graded
One decision, full context
The context stays attached to the decision through the final result.
What stays attached
Illustration based on the live product · public results remain available on The Lineup
01 / Sports analytics
Live product · Founder, product owner, solo builder
The Lineup
A live sports product that connects projections, market prices, subscriptions, and recorded results.
Customers can compare a projection with current prices, make their own decision, and return later to see the recorded result.
- 01Public web product
- 02Published iOS application
- 03Automated grading and public result history
A projection is never shown on its own. The current price, timestamp, model context, and final result stay attached. The customer still decides whether any opportunity is worth acting on.
The Lineup
Business monitoring
Latest finding
Freshness issue needs review
Illustration based on the private review dashboard · no production data shown
02 / Business monitoring
Production operations system · Founder, system designer, and operator
The Lineup AI Operations
Four specialized AI workers monitor the business—but they cannot quietly change production.
The recurring checks now happen on a schedule, issues are kept in one review queue, and production changes cannot happen without explicit approval.
- 01Four named workers in one review system
- 02Scheduled and manual checks with a recorded finding and next action
- 03Approval and reliability checks keep incomplete or blocked work visible
The workers can inspect and recommend; they cannot quietly deploy, suppress a model, contact a customer, or make another protected production change. I review and approve those decisions. The system also keeps a check separate from a verified fix.
Case 02491
Service provided
Evidence package
Ready for operator review
Sources linked
8 / 8
Missing evidence
None detected
Representative process · identifying data removed
03 / Travel operations
Production enterprise system · Data scientist and system builder while employed
Dispute Defender
Turn a high-volume dispute queue into evidence-backed responses.
Reviewers received a case-specific set of source records instead of rebuilding every dispute by hand or relying on a generic response.
- 01Built for high-volume operational use
- 02Evidence remained traceable to source records
- 03Production enterprise deployment
The system organized existing records; it did not invent facts or make the final judgment. A reviewer approved the response. The public illustration is representative because the company and customer records are confidential.
01
Google Doc
Approved source
02
Review
SEO + image
03
WordPress
Draft only
Article draft
When anxiety does not feel temporary
Representative process · client content anonymized
04 / Healthcare content operations
Client delivery · Process designer and implementation consultant
Trauma Therapy Group Publisher
Move a reviewed Google Doc into WordPress without rebuilding the article by hand.
The team can move approved copy into a structured WordPress draft without rebuilding the article by hand.
- 01Completed client phase
- 02End-to-end document-to-draft process
- 03Human review retained before publication
The automation prepares and organizes the draft. It does not make the final clinical or publishing decision, and it does not auto-publish content.
Bring the recurring work
Is a recurring process still harder to trust than it should be?
Bring one recurring process and the point where it keeps breaking. We will decide whether it has a clear enough finish line for a sprint.